Low Level laser Therapy (LLLT) Cold Laser - THOR Laser

USA Sales: 877 355 3151 | UK Sales: 01494 797 100 | Head office: +44 (0)1494 797 100
Sales Enquiries
Product Packages Sports Injuries Nerve Regeneration Light Therapy for Acne Wound Healing Chronic Pain Equine Therapy Companion Pet Laboratory Smoking Cessation USA Applications Custom systems Design services & manufacturing
Laser Training Courses UK and Ireland USA and Canada Australia and New Zealand Request a training course in your country Conferences
introduction to LLLT Musculoskeletal pain and injuries Wound Healing USA FDA cleared Applications Lancet - Neck Pain Literature Watch
Latest research news blog THOR LLLT Videos Subscribe to our Newsletter Current THOR Newsletter Low Level Laser Therapy News LLLT Treatment Photos Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter
Sales Enquiries Contact Head Office Treatment Enquiries Customer Feedback Dosage Calculator Equipment Services Online Payments Delivery & Warranty

Media Watch

Go Here for Archives

Low Level Laser Therapy In The Management Of Chronic Myofascial Pain In The Neck

A Gur, AJ Sarac, R Cevik, O Altindag, and S Sarac
Lasers Surg Med, January 1, 2004; 35(3): 229.

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, and controlled trial was conducted in patients with chronic myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) in the neck to evaluate the effects of infrared low level 904 nm Gallium-Arsenide (Ga-As) laser therapy (LLLT) on clinical and quality of life (QoL).

STUDY DESIGN/PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 60 MPS patients. Patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: Group I (actual laser; 30 patients) and Group II (placebo laser; 30 patients). LLLT continued daily for 2 weeks except weekends. Follow-up measures were evaluated at baseline, 2, 3, and 12 weeks. All patients were evaluated with respect to pain at rest, pain at movement, number of trigger points (TP), the Neck Pain and Disability Visual Analog Scale (NPAD), Beck depression Inventory (BDI), and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). RESULTS: In active laser group, statistically significant improvements were detected in all outcome measures compared with baseline (P < 0.01) while in the placebo laser group, significant improvements were detected in only pain score at rest at the 1 week later of the end of treatment. The score for self-assessed improvement of pain was significantly different between the active and placebo laser groups (63 vs. 19%) (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: This study revealed that short-period application of LLLT is effective in pain relief and in the improvement of functional ability and QoL in patients with MPS. Lasers Surg. Med. 35:229-235, 2004.

Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.