Low Level laser Therapy (LLLT) Cold Laser - THOR Laser

USA Sales: 877 355 3151 | UK Sales: 01494 797 100 | Head office: +44 (0)1494 797 100
Purchase Enquiries
Oral Mucositis Pain (PDF) Wound Healing Sport (PDF) Equine Companion Pet Smoking Cessation Custom systems
Laser Training Courses Info UK and Ireland dates USA and Canada dates Australia and New Zealand dates Rest Of World dates Request a training course in your country Conferences
Introduction to LLLT Dosage Calculator LLLT dose review (PDF) Research blog Pain (PDF) Soft tissue injuries (PDF) Wound healing (PDF)
About us Blog THOR LLLT Videos Subscribe to our Newsletter Current THOR Newsletter Delivery & Warranty Contract Manufacturing LLLT Treatment Photos Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter
Contact Head Office Purchase Enquiries Treatment Enquiries Customer Feedback Equipment Services Online Payments

Media Watch

Go Here for Archives

Low Level Laser Therapy In The Management Of Chronic Myofascial Pain In The Neck

A Gur, AJ Sarac, R Cevik, O Altindag, and S Sarac
Lasers Surg Med, January 1, 2004; 35(3): 229.

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, and controlled trial was conducted in patients with chronic myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) in the neck to evaluate the effects of infrared low level 904 nm Gallium-Arsenide (Ga-As) laser therapy (LLLT) on clinical and quality of life (QoL).

STUDY DESIGN/PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 60 MPS patients. Patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: Group I (actual laser; 30 patients) and Group II (placebo laser; 30 patients). LLLT continued daily for 2 weeks except weekends. Follow-up measures were evaluated at baseline, 2, 3, and 12 weeks. All patients were evaluated with respect to pain at rest, pain at movement, number of trigger points (TP), the Neck Pain and Disability Visual Analog Scale (NPAD), Beck depression Inventory (BDI), and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). RESULTS: In active laser group, statistically significant improvements were detected in all outcome measures compared with baseline (P < 0.01) while in the placebo laser group, significant improvements were detected in only pain score at rest at the 1 week later of the end of treatment. The score for self-assessed improvement of pain was significantly different between the active and placebo laser groups (63 vs. 19%) (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: This study revealed that short-period application of LLLT is effective in pain relief and in the improvement of functional ability and QoL in patients with MPS. Lasers Surg. Med. 35:229-235, 2004.

Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.